Friday, March 20, 2009 

Which, when you think about it, is insane: What had brought us to the brink of collapse in the first place was this relentless instinct for building ever-larger megacompanies, passing deregulatory measures to gradually feed all the little fish in the sea to an ever-shrinking pool of Bigger Fish. To fix this problem, the government should have slowly liquidated these monster, too-big-to-fail firms and broken them down to smaller, more manageable companies. Instead, federal regulators closed ranks and used an almost completely secret bailout process to double down on the same faulty, merger-happy thinking that got us here in the first place, creating a constellation of megafirms under government control that are even bigger, more unwieldy and more crammed to the gills with systemic risk.

 

In the hopes that we can please think about our current situation with a clear head let us stop referring to these giant cogs we created in our crazy machine as people.  AIG does not have knees... it has broken parts in a machine that is breaking down:

Too late. Jean Wieson, who has lived down the block for 24 years, had stopped her car in front of Mr. Haas’s house before he arrived home. She was angry about the millions of dollars in bonuses paid to its executives, the credit-default swaps that brought American International Group to its knees, the $170 billion the federal government has spent to prop it up. "It makes me absolutely sick," she said. "It’s despicable. It’s disgusting what these people have done. They should be forced to give every cent back."

Thursday, March 19, 2009 

Mr. President I am worried that I may have been a bit right - is the job too big for any man? Even you?

Here's the deal: when you say 'These financial industries are holding us hostage,' I believe you. It strikes me that you are not unlike, well, me perhaps when it comes to fixing something on my car. You look at this once beautiful amazing machine and you realize, 'Man, some of this might be over my head' because the problem is too difficult or the piece of machinery is too unwieldly.

And that to me is what it seems the issue has been all along, not that it might help too much now. We created way too big of cogs in this bastardly (notice how it seems like it has no father) machine we created for ourselves. So many people have been talking on TV about 'the patient' - this strange machine we built for ourselves should never be confused with the beauty that is the human body or any of God's creatures for that matter. We built an ugly Matrix-like machine that is now owning us. We let some pieces get too damn big. We let it get out of control.

So from this small corner of the globe Mr. President here is to you: the mechanic of the ages.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009 

It's funny how quickly one can swing from despair and anger to something more moderate. Many emotions on these heady days when neighbors are being laid off or 'resigning' as the case may be. It is hard to get past the collective anger and confusion and despair and questioning. But then you read a piece such as Ruth's and you start to realize that maybe there just isn't a better solution out there.

We have built ourselves quite a machine here haven't we? We made some really big cogs in this machine that frankly it seems that if one of them goes down (Lehman?) -- this machine goes down.

So anyway this is to say that I hope my worst fears are not realized and the more moderate in me right now says: things will be okay once we get out of this strange emergency.

I can't wait to read the history books about this era.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009 

'They killed the golden goose.'  

It is what a friend of mine said to me on the golf course this weekend and I can't get it out of my head.  They really did, didn't they?  Now I can't say I am obsessed with this, but I will say when things like what we are seeing now go down like this I always think to myself: follow the money and where was the root of the problem?  Looking at some of the graphs and statistics it seems somewhere around 1995 or so there was a concentrated effort to get people in houses: The American Dream!  

I am sure it all started out with the best of intentions especially during that time when the internet was heating up, easy money was flowing and jobs were generally plentiful.  That said would I like to know the specifics of the meetings that happened during this time and when and how decisions were made?  In the immortal words of Mrs. Palin: you betcha.  

Then things continued apace for a while and then we were confronted with a downturn and internet bust around 2000.  A new resident took office.  An atrocious attack happened.  All the while in the background a certain agenda was still at play and that was to get people into homes.  Yet my guess was that 9/11 and other factors like laziness turned what may have been a 80/20% noble/misbegotten policy into a more roughly 40/60% noble/misbegotten policy ratio during these heady times.  But hey, things were working and what may have been a real tough time for us after the attacks seemed rather mellow compared with the eternal 'what might have been'.  

Yet perhaps during this time Cheney, Greenspan and Bush may have met with Barry Bonds or watched too much of A-roid on the tube because it seems the plan that started out perhaps 80% noble soon turned into something 80% sinister (and on steriods): interest rates were kept especially low even though thanks to various efforts (war?) we soon realized that perhaps the attacks wouldn't really ruin our countries economic strength.   We had our folks go out on the tube and say we should get into these 'exotic' mortgages (clever term) and whatnot.  And the rest as they say is history but they also say history repeats itself and George Bush did bankrupt everything he ever tried to run so, I am not sure where to go from here.  

Oh yes, how the fuck did our golden goose get killed and the American Dream get co-opted and hung out to fucking dry by lazy incompetent asshats?  I prefer not to speculate and would like to know.  Where and when does the criminal investigation start and would you like me to help?  


Monday, March 09, 2009 

'Let’s today step out of the normal boundaries of analysis of our economic crisis and ask a radical question: What if the crisis of 2008 represents something much more fundamental than a deep recession? What if it’s telling us that the whole growth model we created over the last 50 years is simply unsustainable economically and ecologically and that 2008 was when we hit the wall — when Mother Nature and the market both said: “No more.”'

Of course Mr. Friedman got many things wrong in the past, but he is certainly on to something here although did he steal this post and idea from someone else?  If he did why didn't he really touch the third rail (population issues)?


Thursday, March 05, 2009 

This post deserves to be on every blog everywhere.  

Monday, March 02, 2009 

Strange wind blowing.  It is odd which way the revolutionary wind blows in on you eh?  Blows in from the most unexpected of sources like the financial establishment we created out of thin air.  

But what does it mean?  Does it mean only that our financial establishment is fucked or is there something else?  

Well as you can guess from the leading questions I think there is certianly something else happening here and I don't think it is about our finanical system necessarily nor is it about credit.  I think, frankly, we have a population problem: there are just too many of us and it isn't natural and our various systems are straining under the weight.  

Whether you talk about our food supply or natural world and the extinctions we are causing or our unnatural financial system (do you even need a link?) or even our very cultural existance we have prided ourselves on we are facing something very stark in our face if one opens their eyes and heart to the situation: we need to quickly readjust our thinking away from some carbon trading system (as great as that would have been 10 or 20 years ago) and into a realization that our population levels are causing most if not all the issues we are seeing today.  

Is it time yet to address the root of the issue?  Maybe not just yet politically, but perhaps sooner than I would have thought.  

The great and unlooked for discoveries that have taken place of late years have all concurred to lead many men into the opinion that we were touching on a period big with the most important changes. 
Thomas Malthus 

 

Listening to Howard right now and he is going off on Rush for his contention that he hopes that Obama fails.  Good for him for saying what is true: that Rush is being a traitor.  Oddly though when you listen to a guy like Rush, not unlike Coulter, you know he doesn't even believe what he is saying.  They are just empty suit gas bags who are saying things for the sake of saying them, creating controversy and perhaps making some profit off of it which is the saddest thing of all eh?  

Archives

Links

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates