« Home | So how can the people ‘rise up’ in your view?A.By ... » | It started off slow with me not sure I was into it... » | I have to fully admit I am disappointed in us over... » | 'Nobody is ordering Maria Bartiromo to lobby to ke... » | Mr. Brooks, You seemingly could not be more wrong ... » | Greetings from halfway through our Mr. Mom 'vacati... » | Hello Mr. President and Staff, Hope all is well an... » | Thank you Bill for bringing up both of my most rec... » | 'But I will make this simple point in the hope som... » | 'Neither the administration, nor our political sys... » 

Monday, September 28, 2009 

Hello Dr. Johnson,
I am currently watching your talk at MIT Sloan which I find very interesting - thank you for your input on so many varied matters and I think you handled the difficult art student with major poise.

An interesting topic that I have considered quite a bit recently is the idea of 'too big to fail'. Understandably people focus quite a bit on the banks these days and this question but I also worry in other areas specifically the industry I work in (technology). Frankly put, Oracle, Google, HP, Dell, Apple and others are arguably too big to fail right now as well. Telecommunications has similar issues of course. I am sure there are many industries in this situation now as well - how do we hopefully address this as well? We are living in a time of huge monopolies that not only pose a risk to us as something that might fail, but also in many other ways. Is receivership and bankruptcy the solution here? Any trust busting to come?

On the flip side I can somewhat understand how we got here as we are trying to compete on a world stage against huge nationalized corporations but that said I would be interested in your input on this matter or if I am off base in even being concerned with this at this time. Are innovation-stifling monopolies simply something we have to live with in our new world?

Archives

Links

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates