« Home | This is good to read and see in a number of differ... » | Do we need a red light before going green? | Persp... » | It's a debate we ought to have — but probably won'... » | Global warming to continue for centuries - Yahoo! ... » | To follow up: It is sad that we are now losing spo... » | Bush: Congress must limit pork spending - Yahoo! N... » | Ancient ice shelf breaks free in Arctic - World En... » | Talking Points Memo: by Joshua Micah Marshall Dece... » | Climate change may kill European skiing - Sunday T... » | U.S. gasoline prices creep up - Automotive - MSNBC... » 

Friday, February 23, 2007 

Hello from beautiful Monterey.

I suppose it was not the most profound idea ever but I was thinking over these past few days about Spears and Anna and why the fuck I have to hear so goddamn much about them yet we can go, what, 6 months or 12 months and not hear a goddman thing about Mr. Dick (except of course when he shoots a dude in the face).

Got me to wondering what the fuck I have to hear so much about these ladies when we pay this other dude's salary? I understand that tabloid journalism and entertainment journalism is important to a lot of people, but my point is that, wow, we can't turn part of our glaring media light on Dick or the resident? Find out what they did today in their lives. Find out how the fuck one chokes on a pretzel and gives himself a black eye. Find out what they ate for dinner, who they partied with, etc. Please, tell me about people who I am paying to help me and us.

Color me confused.

On another note, I got the chance to watch Mr. Michael Crichton on Charlie Rose the other day. I really love this guy's writing but what a pompous ass. I really like Charlie calling him on some of the stuff he did for instance when Crichton was saying he is not a 'catastrophy-ist' or whathaveyou and Charlie pretty much saying, 'yet all your books are about some sort of looming catastrophy'. Pretty classic. Good banter and good on Michael for sitting down with this knowledgable host for a bevy of good questions. Also I give credit to Crichton for his clarification of a number of different (very controversial) positions he has taken in regards to the environment however one question I might have wanted Charlie to ask him was this (when Michael was claiming that science, no emotions, should rule the climate debate): 'But Michael like all of us you are part of this earth and will be again one day. Do you not feel that 1. you have an emotional, spiritual and physical connection to the earth and 2. that this might not be perhaps germane to the discussion and course of action?'

The mind can cloud the heart and vice versa but neither can live without the other.

Hug a hill of trees.

Archives

Links

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates